The Cosmic “Tool Kit”

Published on 24 Jun 2016 at 4:18 pm. Comments Off on The Cosmic “Tool Kit”.
Filed under Uncategorized.

The Cosmic “Tool Kit”

Shelf #2

tools:

* SUBJECTIVITY OF
“INFINITE DIVINE” *

* HYPER-ITERATION *

* SIMULTANEOUS OPERATION LEVELS *

* ONE ORGANIC SUPER-EQUATION *

* INSTINCT-DNA *

* RECURSIVITY IS REGNANT
(RECURSIVITY REIGNS) *

* EXTRAORDINARIATION *

* EMOTION-EXPRESSION-DRAMA
*

* OPTIMIZING
COMPLEXIFICATION/CONTOURIZATION *

* MACRO-HOLISTIC-OPTIMIZATION *

* CHERRY-PICKED EVOLUTION *

* TEMPLATE FIDELITY *

* METAPHYSICAL > PHYSICAL LEVERAGED BUYOUT *

* CUMULATIVE / MASSED-ARRAY DESIGN *

••• TOOL:

* SUBJECTIVITY OF “INFINITE DIVINE

EXTRAORDINARIATION” *

“INFINITE DIVINE EXTRAORDINARIATION ” may be

used as

“religious DIVINE”

or

as a spiritual-perfection
DIVINE;

or

as an INFINITE DIVINE EXTRAORDINARIATION
with a

RELIGIOUS DIVINE “GODHEAD”

(but one can make a strong case for a spectrum of

possibilities)

There are, of course,
innite striations of this.

Addition to Cosmic Tool Kit:

(although alluded-to in
the text multiple times,

but less formally)

••• TOOL:

* HYPER

–

ITERATION *

(my term)

On multiple levels,
MACRO, and MICRO,

the cosmos continuously
hyper-iterates, i.e.

All organic entities
ask and re-assess:

Given my current assets,
and given the multiple
layers

of contexts,

what is my best next move (evolvement)

– to advance both my individual Q4P

and the overall cosmic Q4P?

[How often? Unclear]

••• TOOL:

* SIMULTANEOUS OPERATION LEVELS *

The cosmos may very well be operating on multiple

levels simultaneously,
all INTERACTIVE with each
other.

a ) Potentiality-level

b ) Equation-level

c ) Proto-Metaphysical-level

d ) Metaphysical-level

e ) Reality-level

f ) Innite Divine Extraordinariation-level

Broadly speaking, presumably we are in (e)

anked by (d) and (f).

Would need a separate
book just to more fully
elaborate

on the above “quick snapshot.”

God and Good deals with these issues in this part,

Cosmic Womb.

••• SUPER-TOOL:

* ONE ORGANIC SUPER-EQUATION *

(my term)

All subjects and elds and emotions, and,
indeed, all

history past and future, are all part of our
one supra–

equation – Q4P

∞

All elds and subjects ultimately dovetail
into the supra–

equation.

We see distinct
snippets, like, say, Biology, Chemistry.

Anthropology.

But at some point Biology connects to
the Calculus, etc.

The interaction of Quest for Potential

∞

– at the

Genesis / Big Bang / Potential

∞

point – with, what I have

called the “Mitosis
of “0”, adds major, major complexity

into an already complex
proposition.

Nevertheless, we can
only take matters as far as is

appropriate to hypothesize
at this point.

••• TOOL:

* INSTINCT-DNA *

(my term)

Complex instinct mechanisms,
whether for SURVIVAL,

food-HUNTING, SEXUAL–hunting, MATING,

PARENTING, INTER–PERSONAL BEHAVIOR
and others,

are potentially transmittable
genetically via (hypothesized

here / what I call) INSTINCT–DNA

••• TOOL:

* RECURSIVITY IS REGNANT (RECURSIVITY REIGNS)
*

(my term)

Potential within potential
within potential.

Schematically:

The Cosmic “Tool Kit” Shelf #1

Published on 24 Jun 2016 at 3:45 pm. Comments Off on The Cosmic “Tool Kit” Shelf #1.
Filed under Uncategorized.

The Cosmic “Tool Kit”

Shelf #1

tools:

* DIVISION INTO POLARITIES & DUALITIES *

* SIMULTANEOUS PUSH / PULL TENSION *

* INFINITELY-COILED SPIRALITY *

* COSMIC ‘LEVERAGED BUYOUT’ (“BOOTSTRAPPING”) *

* (INFINITE) RECURSIVENESS & (INFINITE)

LOOP-ABILITY *

* 1:1 METAPHYSICAL CORRESPONDENCE *

* MITOSIS OF “0” *

* INEXORABLE LIFE-QUESTING *

* VACUUM-BUSTING *

* INEXORABLE & INFINITE ASCENTS *

* MULTI-DIMENSIONAL MORPHING *

* OPTIMIZATION *

* COSMIC-TAPESTRY-WEAVING *

* QUEST FOR INFINITE DIVINE EXTRAORDINARIATION *

* INTERLOCKING DIVINE INFINITUDE QUEST
*

*

HYPER-COSMIC RESOURCEFULNESS *

note:

Starting with this sub-section, there are NOTES by

KHALIL;

There are approximately three dozen NOTES total by

KHALIL – all in this Part I of the book – “THE COSMIC

WOMB of POTENTIAL”.

*

“A carpenter needs good
tools”

– Carpenter’s union

Hypothesis:

We propose and hypothesize
the following Cosmic

“Tool Kit”

[This “Tool Kit” is key and integral to our proposed

metaphysics]

This “Tool Kit” might seem to be a ‘light’ section, but

essentially provides the
“SET of KEYS” necessary to

open the vault containing the elusive
‘Cosmic Code’

…once you examine the Tool Kit, the Holy Grail of

metaphysics is laid
bare… discern the Tool Kit – and

the construction of
the Metaphysics of the
Cosmos

falls readily into place

1,2

(sounds presumptuous enough)

(all “TOOLS” are direct
sub-components of the

overarching Quest for
Potential

∞

)

••• TOOL:

* DIVISION into POLARITIES &
DUALITIES *

Polarities and Dualities

as well as assorted complementary

Positives / Negatives,

are the BUILDING BLOCKS

and counter-point balancers

of the cosmic order

(Articulation of this
concept – whose core is
not original

– commenced in God and Evil….
The ‘spin’ may be

original, but there is,
indeed, voluminous literature

on the subject in many cultures and many languages

stretching back thousands
of years)

NOTES by KHALIL

1

“readily into place”
A: In his preamble to
Derech Hashem Moshe

Chaim Luzatto writes
that before a subject such
as this can be

mastered it must be
understood in a most
general way first.

General principles and
overarching themes are to be understood

before details are probed. Once the framework of the
subject

is made clear, one will then be able to place each detail into its

proper context automatically, and he will ”delight”
in understanding

new facts that add texture to the framework.
This work – God and

Good – is written with this concept in mind.

2

“readily into place”
B: The Cosmic Womb of
Potential, and

particularly the Tool Kit, will elucidate the
general principles that are

central to the paradigm presented here. The “Master Craftsman” of

the cosmos employs
a cosmic tool kit.
Extraordinary tools open–

the–way for a potentially extraordinary construct. Examine the Tool

Kit, and you will grasp the dimensions of
the cosmic construct.

••• TOOL:

* SIMULTANEOUS PUSH / PULL TENSION *

(my term)

Masculine / Feminine

Components of the cosmos are in

DYNAMIC TENSION and/or
ENGAGEMENT

Some components simultaneously

PUSH from one dimension,
and PULL from another
realm

For example: a component may PUSH from a

metaphysical level,

while it PULLS from a REALITY realm – or
from a still

further-out POTENTIAL
realm.

••• TOOL:

* INFINITELY-COILED SPIRALITY *

(my term)

INFINITELY-COILED SPIRALITY is the favorite innity-tool

in the Tool Kit.

One can conjecture that
the specic ‘spirality’
parallels a

double-helix.

Meaning, COILED SPIRALITY
is the “cosmic highway”.

Encapsulization: The cosmos
is more like an innitely

coiled – and expanding – and regenerating
– spiral spring.

SPIRALITY is closely
inter-linked with…

“BOOTSTRAPPING” (another cosmic tool, next)

••• TOOL:

* COSMIC ‘LEVERAGED
BUYOUT’ (“BOOTSTRAPPING”) *

(my term)

Leveraging (innite) POTENTIALS
down–the–road

3, 4, 5

(forward towards innity) to energize the ‘present’

A key concept positioned centrally in the
predecessor

work God and Evil, but using more prosaic terminology

here. This above–proposed “TOOL” alone could
keep

metaphysics – and physics – busy for a thousand

years or so.

Encapsulization: Potentials down-the-road energize the

PRESENT (and initially
ignited CREATION itself).

••• TOOL:

* (INFINITE) RECURSIVENESS
& (INFINITE) LOOP–ABILITY *

(my term)

An entity or theme repeating within itself…..indenitely…

is a key cosmic theme. For instance
POTENTIAL, as we

dene it, is recursive… i.e.

Potential within Potential
within Potential ad
innitum

Recursiveness of Quest
for Potential

∞

:

The power of Q4P (Quest for Potential

∞

) hinges on its

(innite) recursiveness. Like an innitely coiled
spring.

To the extent that it keeps iterating innitely outward
and

onward, it self–charges
and perpetuates its power.

Another way of looking at this is always assuming

Q4P to mean – Q4P to the power–of–innity.

NOTES by KHALIL

3

Leverage A: “Leveraged Buyout” is a term
from finance. It

refers to a case in which a financier buys
a company using future

earnings as the collateral. For instance, a financier might offer to

pay $1 million dollars a year for ten years to buy a company. And

where, does he plan
to get the million dollars
per year? From the

future projected earnings of the company – of $1.5 million dollars

a year. The financier essentially buys the
company using the

company’s own future earnings (i.e. He
buys the company with

the company’s own potential). Birnbaum is
positing throughout

Summa Metaphysica that
the original “leveraged buyout”
concept

was cosmic. The cosmos was created, he hypothesizes,
out of the

cosmos’ own potential.

4

Leverage B: Plato had infused in Western
philosophy that “God”

created the universe out
of ‘primal matter’ even
though Plato never

articulates just where
this primal matter came from
– just as he

never explicates where
”God” came from. Platonic thought –

and, indeed, most Western philosophical thought – including

classic Jewish philosophy
– is linear, i.e. A created B created
C,

etc.

Birnbaum’s paradigm, on the other hand,
is ‘bootstrap’, i.e. the

potential of A ignites A retroactively. The Torah Itself has a one –

phrase all–encompassing treatise on Jewish philosophy: “Eheyeh

Asher Eheyeh”. This is Potential within Potential within Potential,

which Birnbaum seizes upon as the crux
of Summa Metaphysica.

5

Leverage C: A classic theme in Jewish
thought is “yesh mai–

ayen,” the creation of
somethingness, from nothingness. This

‘magic trick’ receives
an elegant ‘makeover’ in Birnbaum’s

“leveraged buyout” theme,
namely that potentials down–the–

road ignited the cosmos.
Now, finance is not cosmology – and

cosmology is not finance, but the “leveraged
buyout” theme can

indeed be applied to both. Indeed, there is a
1:1 parallel between

the two.

239 REPRINTS OF COSMIC “TOOL KIT”

But what does that mean?

It really means innite
recursiveness,

tracking forward to the
“end of time”

~Example 1: like those painted doll–within–a–doll

Russian or Chinese dolls, where there is always
yet

ANOTHER (smaller) doll
within

~Example 2: an ONION… where there is inevitably
yet

another (smaller) layer

[carrying within itself
still other smaller
layers]

Note that there is actually a ‘double power’
to this:

First, is its innite ~spring effect.

Second is the nature of the proposed
dynamic –

whereby innitely compelling
potentialities ‘down-the-

road’, “ignite” the
present.

••• TOOL:

* 1:1 METAPHYSICAL CORRESPONDENCE *

(my term)

1:1:1:1:1:1 Multi–directional innite

CORRESPONDENCE

* * * metaphysical: cosmic: human
* * *

1:1:1:1:1 (to the innite level) correspondence exists

between what occurs
on

metaphysical

cosmic

human

molecular

sub–molecular

levels

••• TOOL:

* MITOSIS OF “0” *

(my term)

We do not know what existed pre–Big Bang.

Let us call it “0”

We can make assumptions
about “voids” of various

avors, but we certainly do not know

Best to just call it “0”

Now, moving forward…

At CREATION, “0” is presumably divided in
multiple

ways, many beyond our capability of even beginning to

fathom at this point…

counter–balancing Negatives and Positives…

0 divides into

+1, -1………+2, -2
etc.,

Positives and Negatives;

Polar and anti-Polar,

Male and Female; * * * (see Book #1)

metaphysical

cosmic

human

molecular

sub–molecular

levels

••• TOOL:

* MITOSIS OF “0” *

(my term)

We do not know what existed pre–Big Bang.

Let us call it “0”

We can make assumptions
about “voids” of various

avors, but we certainly do not know

Best to just call it “0”

Now, moving forward…

At CREATION, “0” is presumably divided in
multiple

ways, many beyond our capability of even beginning to

fathom at this point…

counter–balancing Negatives and Positives…

0 divides into

+1, -1………+2, -2
etc.,

Positives and Negatives;

Polar and anti-Polar,

Male and Female; * * * (see Book #1)

THE TRANSCENDENT DYNAMIC

Quest for Potential

∞

is thus simultaneously –

• a FORCE

• a QUEST

• a POTENTIAL

• the ongoing open–ended COSMOS

• the Innite Divine Extraordinariation

• the SPARK of LIFE

• the sum total of all eco–systems

• in other words, EVERYTHING as we know
it

Not bad for a dynamic.

••• TOOL:

* VACUUM–BUSTING *

(my term)

Abhorrence of vacuums on
all different levels

(metaphysical, reality and
other levels)

Vacuums – metaphysical or otherwise
– are abhorred

7

Nature abhors a vacuum.
And it presumably abhors a

‘vacuum of principles,’
as well.

So, ‘initially,’ if ‘initially’ can be said to exist, we are

faced with a potential ‘vacuum’ situation.

NOTES by KHALIL

7

The Physical Vacuum: This ‘abhorrence,’
as it were, can be

allegorized as ‘negative
pressure.’ A vacuum exerts a ‘pull’ on

adjacent matter and
thereby seeks its own obliteration. The greater

the relative vacuum, the
greater the negative pressure, the greater

the ‘abhorrence,’ and the
more likely the vacuum is
to obliterate

itself.

Quest for Potential

∞

is thus simultaneously –

• a FORCE

• a QUEST

• a POTENTIAL

• the ongoing open–ended COSMOS

• the Innite Divine Extraordinariation

• the SPARK of LIFE

• the sum total of all eco–systems

• in other words, EVERYTHING as we know
it

Not bad for a dynamic.

••• TOOL:

* VACUUM–BUSTING *

(my term)

Abhorrence of vacuums on
all different levels

(metaphysical, reality and
other levels)

Vacuums – metaphysical or otherwise
– are abhorred

7

Nature abhors a vacuum.
And it presumably abhors a

‘vacuum of principles,’
as well.

So, ‘initially,’ if ‘initially’ can be said to exist, we are

faced with a potential ‘vacuum’ situation.

NOTES by KHALIL

7

The Physical Vacuum: This ‘abhorrence,’
as it were, can be

allegorized as ‘negative
pressure.’ A vacuum exerts a ‘pull’ on

adjacent matter and
thereby seeks its own obliteration. The greater

the relative vacuum, the
greater the negative pressure, the greater

the ‘abhorrence,’ and the
more likely the vacuum is
to obliterate

itself.

The vacuum–breaker principle
was quest for a
possibility

of a principle – or embryonic Quest for Potential

∞

.

And perhaps, reacting to
a potential VACUUM situation,

Q4P then ultimately
achieves a ‘life of its own,’ feeding

upon itself, looping
around itself billions upon
billions of

times, seeking to achieve critical mass… and
eventually

apparently doing so,
rst metaphysically, and
then in full–

blown reality.

••• TOOL:

* INEXORABLE & INFINITE ASCENTS *

ASCENDING LEVELS

of REALITY & ACTUALIZATION & FULLNESS
&

CONSCIOUSNESS

– are ongoing cosmic
imperatives

••• TOOL:

* MULTI-DIMENSIONAL MORPHING *

(my term)

Metaphysical Realms are
not static; they are
dynamically

morphing.

The Emotional Richness
of the Cosmic Order is
not

static; it is dynamically morphing.

The Intellectual Richness
of the Cosmic Order is
not

static; it is dynamically morphing.

The Consciousness Level
of the Cosmic Order is
not

static; it is dynamically morphing.

The Reality Richness
of the Cosmic Order has
not been

static; it has morphed to this point.

Combine all-of-the-above dynamics, and you have a

symphony of ongoing morphing and ever-increasing

richness and advance.

Creation / “Big Bang”
[the Potential

∞

Point] was

possibly at the boundary where metaphysics

“morphed” into physics,
and thus both elds

(metaphysics and physics)
are fully engaged.

We, in contemporary
times, for example, intersect

with this extraordinary
pulsating, morphing advancing

Cosmic Order at-one-specic
particular-point-in-time.

But understand that
between the time you started this

sentence and the time you nish it, the entire Cosmic

order will have
incrementally morphed.

••• TOOL:

* OPTIMIZATION *

On every level, the cosmos and its components, have

an uncanny instinctive
ability to OPTIMIZE

8

[simple and elegant
enough]

NOTES by KHALIL

8

Optimize: The
individual must have the patience
and decisiveness

to act at precisely the opportune time. This ability to ‘seize the

moment’ was harnessed at the Genesis Point
to create the

universe.

245 REPRINTS OF COSMIC “TOOL KIT”

••• TOOL:

* COSMIC–TAPESTRY–WEAVING *

(my term)

Quest for Potential

∞

weaves an ever-expanding, ever–

richer, ever-more-sophisticated, wondrous, multi–

dimensional multi–thread cosmic tapestry encompassing

and integrating ***

ALL elds…(cosmic threads)
metaphysics, philosophy,

theology, physics, astrophysics, chemistry, biology,

medicine, mathematics, astronomy, psychology,

architecture, art, music et al.

in ONE inter–connected
cosmic tapestry

You know the favorite refrain
here…..

“Adoshem Echad, u-Shemo Echad”

“God is ONE and his NAME is ONE”

All part of the ongoing cosmic Innite
Divine Extraordinariation

*** see ••• TOOL: OPTIMIZING COMPLEXIFICATION /

CONTOURIZATION * below in section MU [Shelf
#2]

[not COMPLEXIFICATION
for complexity’s sake
(as is often

viewed in the Physical Sciences as a universal imperative);

rather,
‘complexication’ when it advances
the key thrusts of

multi-dimensional POTENTIAL and OPTIMIZATION]

THE TRANSCENDENT DYNAMIC

[Interesting how a
religious service in an extraordinary

cathedral, for instance,
might bring together so
many of

these themes, e.g. spiritual as well as the extraordinary

aesthetic (art, choir
music, organ music,
architecture)

simultaneously at one
time, in one place, all under a

majestic roof with
spires directed heavenwards]

••• MASTER TOOL:

* QUEST FOR INFINITE DIVINE EXTRAORDINARIATION

9, 10

*

(my term)

* * * Quest for INFINITE DIVINE
EXTRAORDINARIATION:

Fullness/Richness/Beauty/Diversity/Meaning/Fulllment/

Potential et al.
is the key “tool” and metaphysical theme
we

will posit (to ‘crack–the–cosmic–code’)

This particular hypothesized
“tool” will nally unlock
the

nal locked door in METAPHYSICS

key note: this Quest is anti-polar to:

“aimless nothingness”

NOTES by KHALIL

9

Infinite Divine Extraordinariation A: With this
concept, the author

presents a concrete endpoint towards which the path of
both human

and cosmic potential
is directed. It represents
the completion of a

metaphysical framework introduced
in God and Evil and described

more fully here.

10

Infinite Divine Extraordinariation B: The quest for one’s potential

need not be a spiritual experience, particularly
if the endpoint is left

undefined. Here the author
takes a clear stand as
to the endpoint,

describing it as necessarily spiritual and indeed
Divine. The concept

of the Potential

∞

Point still allows for a multiplicity of goals (as will be

exemplified in the
120 Angels) but it ties
these goals together in
the

singular aim of reaching the state of Infinite
Divine.

[Interesting how a
religious service in an extraordinary

cathedral, for instance,
might bring together so
many of

these themes, e.g. spiritual as well as the extraordinary

aesthetic (art, choir
music, organ music,
architecture)

simultaneously at one
time, in one place, all under a

majestic roof with
spires directed heavenwards]

••• MASTER TOOL:

* QUEST FOR INFINITE DIVINE EXTRAORDINARIATION

9, 10

*

(my term)

* * * Quest for INFINITE DIVINE
EXTRAORDINARIATION:

Fullness/Richness/Beauty/Diversity/Meaning/Fulllment/

Potential et al.
is the key “tool” and metaphysical theme
we

will posit (to ‘crack–the–cosmic–code’)

This particular hypothesized
“tool” will nally unlock
the

nal locked door in METAPHYSICS

key note: this Quest is anti-polar to:

“aimless nothingness”

NOTES by KHALIL

9

Infinite Divine Extraordinariation A: With this
concept, the author

presents a concrete endpoint towards which the path of
both human

and cosmic potential
is directed. It represents
the completion of a

metaphysical framework introduced
in God and Evil and described

more fully here.

10

Infinite Divine Extraordinariation B: The quest for one’s potential

need not be a spiritual experience, particularly
if the endpoint is left

undefined. Here the author
takes a clear stand as
to the endpoint,

describing it as necessarily spiritual and indeed
Divine. The concept

of the Potential

∞

Point still allows for a multiplicity of goals (as will be

exemplified in the
120 Angels) but it ties
these goals together in
the

singular aim of reaching the state of Infinite
Divine.

••• TOOL:

* INTERLOCKING DIVINE INFINITUDE QUEST
*

(my term)

The Quest (the journey) is at least as important as the

denouement.

The ongoing QUEST is itself / ITSELF integral to the

Innite Divine Extraordinariation.

One cannot separate
the Divine from the ongoing

Divine Quest.

••• TOOL:

*

HYPER-COSMIC RESOURCEFULNESS

*

(my term)

Q4P will tap-into the full panoply of cosmic
assets

(meaning, of its own assets), in its (ongoing)
development

of new species and organisms.

OVERLAY

Published on 24 Jun 2016 at 3:31 pm. Comments Off on OVERLAY.
Filed under Uncategorized.

OVERLAY

Core Map and Core
Glossary of Potentialism

MAP:

============================================

CWP

THE COSMIC WOMB OF POTENTIAL

Enhanced SuperLaw

P/P

∞

> Q4P > PAs > QJs > E+

[ >> C+ ongoing >> ]

============================================

 

C+ = Complexication+ = (increased > complexity/

sophistication/richness/variety/wondrousness/step-up)

============================================

and this entire deal

is a quasi-

loop*

or some sort of

Ying-Yang

 

 

* imagine the number 6 or 9

or

a PARTICLE ACCELERATOR

 

where, once instigated,

the LOOPING continues/accelerates

 

GLOSSARY:

=========================================

 

CWP = Cosmic Womb of
Potential

Q4P

∞

= Quest for Potential innitely iterated

Q4P ( Q4P ( Q4P …

 

explained in Section 1 following

quick-reference: www.TheoryCore.com

 

continued

 

PA = Potential Array

 

e.g. types of lions

types of butteries

 

children and grandchildren
et al.

 

( plural would be PAs )

 

QJ = Quantum Jump

> a higher-level platform

> a quantum higher state

> complexifying the Laws of Physics/

Chemistry/Biology

 

> self-organization at higher levels

> mini-Extraordinariation

 

> a new critical-mass level of

Complexication+

> a quasi networking/morphing

( plural would be QJs )

 

A Quantum Jump (QJ) event: A hypothesized
signicant/

watershed/critical-mass cosmic complexication/

sophistication event on-the-march towards

Extraordinariation (E+)

 

 

e.g.

 

“0-Point” > Big Bang universe

energy > atoms

single-cell life > multi-cellular life

[ Our ‘platforms’ are dealt with in more depth in

www.sequence1000.com ]

E+ = Extraordinariation = Innite Max QJ

explained in Section 1

quick-reference: www.summametaphysica.com/extraordinariation/

 

=========================================

continued

 

 

Birnbaum’s Theory of
Potential discerns that one

fundamental, simple formula/superlaw rules the
entirety

of the universe and, indeed, is responsible for its
very

existence: Q4P

∞

→ E+. This equation expresses that

the Quest for Innite Potential drives the universe
ever

onwards towards
Extraordinariation.

What is the Quest for Innite Potential? In simplest
terms,

Q4P represents the
universal, inherent and eternal drive

for everything in the universe to seek higher levels
of

Complexication. What is Complexication (C+)? It
is

the Birnbaum-hypothesized cosmic intermediate drive
–

“Q4P’s handmaiden” –
maneuvering the cosmos towards

greater
complexity/sophistication/richness/variety/

wondrousness (see Glossary1000.com).

In its ongoing march of Complexication –
maneuvering

the cosmos towards increased
complexity, sophistication,

variety and wondrousness – the universe moves
ever-and-

ever closer to what Birnbaum calls
Extraordinariation (E+)

– the universal end-goal – a horizon to be
approached,

but never quite realized – and a state otherwise
dened as

hyper-Complexication.

see also www.CosmicToolKit1000.com

end

 

note: We are using the
following denitions:

Cosmic Order – Everything, everything – both

metaphysical and physical – pre-Big Bang and post

Universe – our physical universe (the current post-Big

bang physical universe)

229 GLOSSARY

 

Glossary of Potentialism Terms

Published on 24 Jun 2016 at 3:24 pm. Comments Off on Glossary of Potentialism Terms.
Filed under Uncategorized.

APPENDIX Z70: Reprise

Published on 24 Jun 2016 at 3:21 pm. Comments Off on APPENDIX Z70: Reprise.
Filed under Uncategorized.

APPENDIX Z69: The Cosmic Spinal Column

Published on 24 Jun 2016 at 3:18 pm. Comments Off on APPENDIX Z69: The Cosmic Spinal Column.
Filed under Uncategorized.

APPENDIX Z68: Quantum Representation of “Physical” Q4P

Published on 24 Jun 2016 at 3:17 pm. Comments Off on APPENDIX Z68: Quantum Representation of “Physical” Q4P.
Filed under Uncategorized.

APPENDIX Z68:

Quantum Representation of

“Physical” Q4P

∞

– pegging-off of
MIT’s Llloyd*

the key contemporary

scientic hypothesis bridge to Summa

from a secular / scientific / mechanistic perspective
–

“All interactions between particles in the universe…convey

not only energy but also information in other words, particles

not only collide, they
compute. What is the entire universe

computing, ultimately? Its own dynamical evolution…
As the

computation proceeds,
reality unfolds.”

-from the back-cover of Programming
the Universe

By Seth Lloyd, Professor,
Mechanical Engineering,

MIT(c) 2006, First Vintage Books Edition (NY)

Lloyd’s hypothesis provides key 1:1 buttress to Summa.

Indeed, “Q4P

∞

is hiding in plain sight,” as we have

hypothesized since 1988 via Summa Metaphysica I

(hardcover), and then
via Summa Metaphysica II (2005)

so,

Birnbaum’s Q4P

∞

resonates as a fuller
multi-dimensional

wrap-around conceptualization
re:

Lloyd’s universe as a programming entity

*MIT scientist Seth Lloyd directs the Center for Extreme Quantum

Information Theory at MIT, where he is also a professor
of Mechanical

Engineering.

APPENDIX Z67: Contemporary Natural Selection Theory: Mechanism & Criteria

Published on 24 Jun 2016 at 3:14 pm. Comments Off on APPENDIX Z67: Contemporary Natural Selection Theory: Mechanism & Criteria.
Filed under Uncategorized.

APPENDIX Z67:

Contemporary Natural Selection

Theory: Mechanism & Criteria

Is there a clear and focused academic scientic

conviction/consensus on the mechanism and criteria

for Natural Selection? The answer is NO.

See two groups of excerpts from Wikipedia

First group*

a

note – this LISTING only deals with the “main
gures”

Main gures in selection debate

“Besides Richard Dawkins and George C. Williams,
other

biologists and philosophers have expanded and
rened

the selsh-gene theory,
such as John Maynard Smith,

George R. Price, Robert Trivers,
David Haig, Helena

Cronin, David Hull, Philip Kitcher, and Daniel C. Dennett.

Individuals opposing this gene-centric view include
Ernst

Mayr, Stephen Jay Gould,
David Sloan Wilson, and

philosopher Elliott Sober.”…

Proponents of multilevel selection (MLS) include E.
O.

Wilson, David Sloan Wilson, Elliott Sober, Richard E.

Michod, and Samir Okasha.

Second group*

b

21st century

Macroevolution and microevolution

“One of the tenets of the modern evolutionary
synthesis

was that macroevolution (the evolution of
phylogenic

clades at the species level and above) was solely
the

result of the mechanisms of microevolution (changes in

gene frequency within populations) operating over
an

extended period of time. During the last decades of
the

20th century some paleontologists raised questions about

whether other factors, such as punctuated
equilibrium

and group selection operating on the level of
entire

species and even higher level phylogenic clades,
needed

to be considered to explain patterns in evolution
revealed

by statistical analysis of the fossil record. Near the end

of the 20th century some researchers in evolutionary

developmental biology suggested that interactions

between the environment and the developmental
process

might have been the source of some of the
structural

innovations seen in macroevolution, but other
evo-devo

researchers maintained
that genetic mechanisms visible

at the population level are fully sufcient to
explain all

macroevolution.”

Epigenetic inheritance

“Epigenetics is the study of heritable changes in
gene

expression or cellular phenotype caused by
mechanisms

other than changes in the underlying DNA sequence.

By the rst decade of the 21st century it had
become

accepted that Epigenetic mechanisms were a
necessary

part of the evolutionary origin of cell differentiation.

Although epigenetics in multicellular organisms is
generally

thought to be a mechanism involved in differentiation, with

epigenetic patterns “reset” when organisms reproduce,

there have been some observations of
transgenerational

epigenetic inheritance. This shows that in some
cases

non genetic changes to an organism can be
inherited

and it has been suggested that such inheritance can
help

with adaptation to local conditions and affect
evolution.

Some have suggested that in certain cases a form
of

Lamarckian evolution may occur.”

Unconventional evolutionary theory

Omega Point

“Pierre Teilhard de
Chardin’s metaphysical Omega Point

Theory describes the gradual development of the
universe

from subatomic particles to human society, which he

viewed as its nal stage and goal. Cosmologist Frank
J.

Tipler subscribes to a
version of this theory.”

Gaia hypothesis

“Teilhard de Chardin’s ideas have been seen by

advocates of the Gaia theory proposed by James

Lovelock, which holds that the living and
nonliving

parts of Earth can be viewed as a complex
interacting

system with similarities to a single organism, as
being

connected to Lovelock’s
ideas. The Gaia hypothesis

has also been viewed by Lynn
Margulis and others as

an extension of endosymbiosis and exosymbiosis.
This

modied hypothesis postulates that all living
things

have a regulatory effect
on the Earth’s environment that

promotes life overall.”

from the author –

For “my take” on the particular matter see above –

Exhibit Z64: Q4P

∞

& Natural Selection

Wikipedia Online

*a

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene-centered_view_of_evolution (accessed June
23, 2013)

*b

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_evolutionary_thought (accessed June
23, 2013)

APPENDIX Z66: Consciousness & Cosmos

Published on 24 Jun 2016 at 3:09 pm. Comments Off on APPENDIX Z66: Consciousness & Cosmos.
Filed under Uncategorized.

APPENDIX Z66:

Consciousness & Cosmos

Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-

Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly

False is a 2012 book by Thomas Nagel, Professor of

Philosophy at New York
University © Oxford University

Press Sept. 2012

from Wikipedia

Overview

“In the book, Nagel argues that the materialist
version

of evolutionary biology is unable to account for
the

existence of mind and consciousness, and is therefore

at best incomplete. He writes that mind is a basic
aspect

of nature, and that any philosophy of nature that cannot

account for it is fundamentally misguided. He argues
that

the standard physico-chemical reductionist account of

the emergence of life – that it emerged out of a
series

of accidents, acted upon by the mechanism of
natural

selection — ies in the face of common sense.

Nagel’s position is that
principles of an entirely different

kind may account for the emergence of life, and in

particular conscious life, and that those principles
may

be teleological, rather than materialist or
mechanistic. He

stresses that his argument is not a religious one…”

from the author –

As we know, the guiding
principle/dynamic/force Quest

for Potential

∞

is overarching, which would include its

teleological dimension. From the get-go and thru
its

end-goals, Q4P

∞

would foster and advance both the

emergence of (mind and then) Consciousness, and
the

ever-increasing
nurturing/expansion/elevation thereof.

*

Wikipedia Online, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_and_Cosmos (accessed June 23, 2013)

APPENDIX Z65: How does Q4P interact with the physical world?

Published on 24 Jun 2016 at 3:07 pm. Comments Off on APPENDIX Z65: How does Q4P interact with the physical world?.
Filed under Uncategorized.

« Previous Entries Next Page »