APPENDIX Z19: The Data
Published on 24 Jun 2016 at 1:09 pm.
No Comments.
Filed under Uncategorized.
APPENDIX Z19:
The Data
Comporting to the data v.
Data proving the hypothesis
Data proving the hypothesis
Metaphysicians doing metaphysics seek an
all-embracing
all-embracing
hypothesis, at-a-minimum comporting to the data.
Metaphysicians seek ‘aesthetic elegance.’
Physicists doing physics want testability.
They want
They want
data proving the hypothesis. To them, a successful
experiment is by denition elegant. To them, Grand
Theory metaphysics is not Center Stage – as by
denition
denition
it cannot be proven.
Now, Summa poses an
intriguing issue for physics.
intriguing issue for physics.
Because, on the one hand, (innite) Summa cannot
necessarily be proven in the classic sense, which
physics
physics
would prefer. Eve though
it is always hard to prove the
it is always hard to prove the
innite and/or timeless.
But, on the other hand,
(a) Summa lls-in crucial and key gaps in physics
and
(b) No data or knowledge accumulated in the past
5,000+ years at all contradicts Summa.
No other metaphysics can make these claims.
Thus, the fully synchronous data underpins Summa,
while
while
Summa underpins physics and astrophysics et al.