APPENDIX K: Cracking the Cosmic Code*
Published on 24 Jun 2016 at 11:34 am.
No Comments.
Filed under Uncategorized.
APPENDIX K:
Cracking the Cosmic Code*
Physics attempts to do so.
Secular philosophy attempts to do so.
Religious philosophy attempts to do so.
All hit major “roadblocks.”
Why is that?
*or more precisely, unraveling another crucial layer or two of the
cosmic code
Because, the code–breaker
is Quest for Potential
is Quest for Potential
∞
/
Extraordinariation, (Q4P), which is at the intersection
of all three, but not classically thoroughly within any
of the three.
Do the three indeed intersect?
The mainstream classic wisdom would be –
not necessarily.
But the mainstream classic wisdom is wrong.
All three intersect at their fount (see exhibit
above –
above –
Convergence).
And their fount is the
crucial intersection.
crucial intersection.
Only a dynamic with the transcendent – and
“intersecting”
“intersecting”
– overarching power of Q4P,
could possibly have had the power to ignite a
cosmos.
cosmos.
Q4P would be in the realm of Metaphysics. Not
quite
quite
physics and not quite philosophy of any classic
stripe.
stripe.
Only a theme from within the general genre of Metaphysics
could ultimately be able to provide a potentially
satisfying
satisfying
possible simultaneous answer to hitherto inexplicable
conundrums in those 3 classic realms noted above –
[classic physics]:
Where did the rst quark came
from?
from?
Meaning, where did the very smallest sub-atomic
particle, whatever that turns out to be, come
from?
from?
[classic philosophy]:
Why there is any reality at all?
Meaning, why is there not simply a state
of “nothingness”?
THE TRANSCENDENT DYNAMIC
[classic religious philosophy]:
What are the eternal origins of the innite (‘eternal’)
Divine? Meaning, by what imperative/actualization is
there the Divine which you posit/assert?
However, the introduction
of Q4P does, respectfully,
of Q4P does, respectfully,
simultaneously and elegantly “solve” all three
issues, and
issues, and
the constellation of related issues in each eld.
I have covered these matters – at least on the
surface –
surface –
over the course of the three volumes of Summa.
*
