Introduction: The Metaphysical Gates of the Forest



Introduction: The Metaphysical Gates of the Forest
by William Johnson,
Professor Emeritus of Philosophy
Brandeis University

“Why is Birnbaum’s paradigm uniquely different from
all pre-existing paradigms?”

Compare three and a half thousand year old Jewish philosophy to a majestic oak tree: roots, trunk, large branches, smaller branches and then leaves. Then figuratively, many of the daring medieval (Golden Age) Jewish philosophers often dealt with the trunk and the major branches, while many modern Jewish philosophers often deal with some of the branches, some larger, some smaller, and some of the interesting leaves. The Kabbalists often dealt with the roots,
but generally from an acutely mystical, esoteric,
and generally, obscure fashion.

Birnbaum maintains that the structural weaknesses in existing philosophical constructs, leave one no choice but to go after the major root. That if one gets a handle

on the major root, one gets a handle not only on the major root system, and not only on the entire tree, but, indeed, on the entire forest. That is, one will have in-hand the hitherto elusive key to the gate of the mythical metaphysical forest.

Birnbaum, whose works are rooted partially in Lurianic Kabbalah, goes for the root of the roots, the tap root, and in a non–mystical fashion. As a Master Diamond Cleaver might attempt to cleave an extraordinary and
large rough diamond with one deft tap, so too Birnbaum proposes to crack the cosmic code with one deft dynamic.

Birnbaum, the conceptual theorist, searched for a unique, transcendent dynamic which might, on the
one hand, almost by definition, be Eternal, and which, on the other hand, could possibly be infinitely dynamic. He conceptualizes a candidate: Potential/Possibility. Then Birnbaum asks himself if that dynamic multiplied infinite-fold, could possibly achieve the necessary ‘traction’ to ignite and then propel a cosmos? He emerges with Quest for Potential∞ (recursive to the infinite power).

Birnbaum’s approach and solution lies on the fault-line between Western and Eastern philosophy. Birnbaum avoids both classic Western linearity, as well as classic Eastern circularity in his formulation. However he will employ demanding Western Aristotelian deductive reasoning, as well as a plethora of Eastern concepts of complementarity.

Dealing in the realms of the infinite, Birnbaum in Book #1 brings to bear his original concepts of INFINITY-POTENTIAL, RECURSIVENESS-POTENTIAL and leveraged RETROACTIVITY-POTENTIAL, all in fashions certainly not employed previously in metaphysics or philosophy. He crafts his metaphysics methodically and very carefully anchored, while keeping a careful eye on the outer boundaries of Jewish theological tradition
and doctrine.

In Book #2, Birnbaum labels the Genesis point as the Potential∞ Point. At the Potential∞ Point, potential Divine becomes the God of Potential. At the Potential∞ Point, potential energy becomes kinetic energy. At the Potential∞ Point, the Metaphysical becomes the Physical.

Moving to fill-out his overarching metaphysics, Birnbaum in Book #2 will daringly conceptualize and propose a series of sophisticated ‘cosmic metaphysical tools’. The approach as well as the arsenal of ‘tools’ is original and powerful. In combination with Quest for Potential∞, these ‘tools’ drive the cosmic engine of Quest for Potential∞.

In Book #2, Birnbaum introduces the concept of Infinite Divine Extraordinariation. Coupled with his patented ‘Quest for Potential∞’ dynamic, his proposed ‘Extraordinariation’ concept will be employed by the author as a daring philosophical 1-2 punch.

The series of ‘cosmic tools,’ employed in combination with the above-noted three particular ‘realm of the infinite concepts,’ merged with yeshiva scholar Birnbaum’s re-engineering of historical Lurianic and Hasidic concepts, net him his unified, overarching metaphysics. Deftly employing his key components,
he sculpts his metaphysical diamond key, which he will
use to “unlock the cosmic lock” to the metaphysical “Gates of the Forest”.

Bringing to bear a repertoire of scholarship and a wide gamut of skills, conceptual theorist Birnbaum whose first Book,God and Evil, I have assigned to Masters Degree candidates at Brandeis in Advanced Religious Philosophy in the ‘90s methodically builds his carefully constructed case. Resolutely stalking-his-quarry, the author surrounds and entraps it in one conceptual net after another.

In Book #1, God and Evil, Birnbaum does so from a Theological-Academic Philosophical Metaphysical perspective (encapsulated in his section 99.00 Unified Formulation in that book; see “Reprint of Unified Formulation” in this book #2).

In Book #2 Birnbaum constructs his case first within a Metaphysical Philosophical construct (“The Cosmic Womb of Potential”). Moving into Section 2 of the second book, he builds his case within a Poetic-Mythical perspective (“God’s 120 Guardian Angels”) and then, finally, moving into the final section of the second book, (“The Lost Manual”) Section 3 of
God and Good, he builds his case within a Holistic –
Self-Actualization Wisdom book construct.

Yeshiva Dov Revel’s inquiring-mind student in the late ’50s, Birnbaum in 2006 believes that the elusive quarry is now finally trapped and cornered. ‘Forged in intellectual fire’ under the multi-year tutelage of his rebbe and mentor, Yeshiva University’s legendary Rav Shmuel Scheinberg, yeshiva-educated Birnbaum believes he has not only firmly anchored his work meticulously in the Torah itself, but has erected fairly impregnable theological shields via the works of Rashi, Ibn Daud, Luria and Abraham Isaac Kook, in particular, to protect his Right flanks. Simultaneously, Harvard grad Birnbaum believes he has the Aristotelian camp and St. Thomas Aquinas intellectually at-bay on his Left flanks. He anticipates, probably correctly, that the Eastern philosophical camps will grant him ‘safe passage’. 18 years after the publication of God and Evil (1988) he is “good-to-go” for his long-awaited final assault on the ‘throne room’ of the Cosmic Code.

Birnbaum’s works are dressed in establishment Aristotelian-style garb; but their soul is Lurianic. This unusual duality compounds the power of his works.

Modern-day Kabbalists are highly likely to be simpatico to his treatise: After 450 years on the very periphery of mainstream philosophy, Kabbalist Luria’s ostensibly mystical 16th century En Sof is re-engineered by the author, and is now enshrined as a metaphysical centerpiece-anchor of Birnbaum’s formidable 21st century major opus, Summa Metaphysica.

According to the Author, only ‘possibility’ or its first-cousin ‘potentiality’ could have existed eternally.
“BY DEFINITION”, according to the Author.

This is key, because aside from the elegance and power of the SUMMA formulation, “BY DEFINITION” is what may very well render this construct quite uniquely “bullet-proof”, and further secure its position in the pantheon of philosophy. By definition, according to the Author, only “Eheyeh” ‘possibility/potentiality’ (Eheyeh Asher Eheyeh – I WILL BE THAT WHICH I WILL BE) Luria’s “En Sof” can be eternal.

According to Birnbaum, METAPHYSICAL POTENTIALS –
in parallel to Luria’s sefirot, Rashi’s angels, Plato’s Forms – are the offspring. Our cosmos, in turn, is a latter-level reality–morphing of the same transcendent metaphysical dynamic. Philosophically and theologically elegant. As these esoteric matters go, Birnbaum’s formulation “keeps it simple” and straightforward enough.

Birnbaum’s Quest for Potential∞ (recursive to the infinite power), after Luria’s En Sof, is the turbo-charged version of ‘potential/possibility’. And everything according to the Author’s hypothesis, is both part of – and driven by this one – overarching sui generis transcendent dynamic. (The Baal Shem Tov, founder
of Hassidism, would certainly smile.)

Simply put, Birnbaum’s Summa Metaphysica proposition attempts to totally overhaul the way the world – East and West – looks at absolutely everything.
His proposed paradigm endeavors to totally change the contours and boundaries of, among other fields, Philosophy, Metaphysics, Cosmology, Cosmogony, Physics and Biology, for starters.

As of this November, 2006, Birnbaum’s key proposition of “Eheyeh” Holy Quest for Potential∞ (recursive to the Infinite power) and the Unified Formulation (see “Reprint of Unified Formulation” in this book) meticulously articulated therein, will have withstood 18 years of international scrutiny since the publication of God and Evil by KTAV in November 1988.

The Author posits: Discern and delineate the “highest common denominator” of the cosmos and that will lead you to the essence and core of Eternity, and, consequently, of the Infinite Divine Extraordinariation; Conceptualize/Discern an all-embracing unifying dynamic in the cosmos, and directly flowing from that dynamic, all major philosophical conundrums will melt before your eyes. Discern the dynamic and the key missing pieces in all the major sciences, including physics, anthropology and biology, let alone theology/philosophy/metaphysics, will inexorably fall into place, as well.

According to the Author, Quest for Potential∞ (to the infinite recursive power) is the Holy Qi that flows through Creation, through the smallest cell, through the oak tree, through Beethoven’s symphonies, through the athlete, the hunter and the shop keeper, through the sunflower and butterfly, through the Biblical texts and through the far reaches of the Milky Way and the cosmos beyond. It flows through the lovers’ twinkle, the baby’s smile, and the intricate nine extraordinary months of fetal development.

However, a concept of the order of potential power noted above, is not proffered forth every day. It is challenging to “get one’s arms around it”. And, as noted above, the philosophical writer Birnbaum has employed two complete inter-related masterworks, conceptualized and crafted over multiple decades,
to achieve that ambitious and formidable end.

Yeshiva Dov Revel’s 1964 valedictorian has now completed his final homework assignment.

Summa Metaphysica will emerge as a pivotal landmark work in the history of ideas.

Professor William Johnson
Waltham, Mass.
Fall, 2006

(With credit for the idea for the title of this piece
to Elie Wiesel’s The Gates of the Forest.)