{"id":123,"date":"2016-06-24T09:22:47","date_gmt":"2016-06-24T09:22:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.potentialismtheory.com\/td\/?p=123"},"modified":"2017-10-31T15:40:22","modified_gmt":"2017-10-31T15:40:22","slug":"elaboration-pull","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.potentialismtheory.com\/td\/?p=123","title":{"rendered":"ELABORATION \u2013 \u201cPull\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
Owing to the particulaly radical nature of this proposition, I cite here<\/div>\n
several buttressing sources from the mainstream contemporary<\/div>\n
scientists\u00a0community. See the following:<\/div>\n
#A John A. Wheeler, \u201cWorld as a System Self-Synthesized by<\/div>\n
Quantum Networking,\u201d IBM Journal of Research and Development<\/div>\n
vol. 32, no. 1 (1988), p. 4.<\/div>\n
#B Cosmologists J. R. Gott III and L.-X. Li, \u201cCan the Universe Create<\/div>\n
Itself?\u201d Physical Review D, vol. 58 (1998], p. 023501.<\/div>\n
#C Astronomer Fred Hoyle who concludes that \u201cthe Universe is seen<\/div>\n
as an inextricably linked loop\u2026Everything exists at the courtesy of<\/div>\n
everything else\u201d. The Intelligent Universe [London: Michael Joseph,<\/div>\n
1983), p. 248.<\/div>\n
#D Cosmologist Paul Davies, The Goldilocks Enigma, chapter 10<\/div>\n
How Come Existence? sub- section \u201cLoops in Time\u201d (pps. 251-<\/div>\n
254) (\u00a9 2006 by Davies, First Mariner Books edition, UK ) for survey<\/div>\n
overview, plus citation to Davies\u2019 own prior causal loop-theory article<\/div>\n
\u201cClosed Time..\u201d in Natural Physical Science , vol. 240, (1972), p. 248.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
In the Afterword \ue0c4nale\u2019 to his 2006 Goldilocks \u2018survey masterwork\u2019,<\/div>\n
Davies concludes that the optimal eventual cosmology [he was not<\/div>\n
aware of Summa Metaphysica 1988, 2005 at that point] would<\/div>\n
contain the following components:<\/div>\n
# Davies – \u201csomething unexpected has to be accepted as a given\u201d<\/div>\n
[ Summa proposes In\ue0c4nite Potential (Q4P ini\ue0c4nitely iterated &<\/div>\n
nesting .]<\/div>\n
# Davies – \u201cand the rest of the explanatory scheme constructed on<\/div>\n
that\u2026\u201d<\/div>\n
[ Summa does just that.]<\/div>\n
# Davies \u2013 [potentially] a closed explanatory or causal loop<\/div>\n
[ Summa has a quasi-closed explanatory\/causal loop (see PULL<\/div>\n
just-above).]<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
# Davies \u2013 [maybe even] a backward-in-time causation whereby the<\/div>\n
universe creates itself\u2026self-contained\u201d<\/div>\n
[ Summa incorporates a similar integral component \u2013 see PULL –<\/div>\n
just-above.]<\/div>\n
# Davies \u2013 \u201csomething self-activating…self-consistent loops capable<\/div>\n
of understanding themselves with (at least the potential for) life and<\/div>\n
mind<\/div>\n
[ Summa comports to this checklist, as well. But articulates just one<\/div>\n
loop.]<\/div>\n
Note that only the suis generis proposed concept of Quest for<\/div>\n
Potential in\ue0c4nitely nested & iterated<\/div>\n
– and then inserted as centerpiece to a nuanced metaphysics –<\/div>\n
could pull-off the multi-tasking Davies is looking for. = because only<\/div>\n
Potential\/Possibility can be posited with conviction as being eternal (<\/div>\n
see point 1a above).<\/div>\n
Davies is clear that the scienti\ue0c4c community is looking for a<\/div>\n
mathematical formula. So here is the deal:<\/div>\n
1) Q4P ( Q4P ( Q4P is a conceptual formula.<\/div>\n
2) Science has been looking in the wrong zone. It should have been<\/div>\n
looking in a conceptual zone – as opposed to a mathematical zone \u2013<\/div>\n
for an ultimate eternal dynamic. Mathematics may be linked-at-the-<\/div>\n
hip to the dynamic, but the dynamic would be the \u2018\ue0c4re breather into<\/div>\n
the equations\u2019 \u2013 and not vice versa.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Owing to the particulaly radical nature of this proposition, I cite here several buttressing sources from the mainstream contemporary scientists\u00a0community. See the following: #A John A. Wheeler, \u201cWorld as a System Self-Synthesized by Quantum Networking,\u201d IBM Journal of Research and Development vol. 32, no. 1 (1988), p. 4. #B Cosmologists J. R. Gott III and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.potentialismtheory.com\/td\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.potentialismtheory.com\/td\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.potentialismtheory.com\/td\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.potentialismtheory.com\/td\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.potentialismtheory.com\/td\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=123"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/www.potentialismtheory.com\/td\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":150,"href":"https:\/\/www.potentialismtheory.com\/td\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123\/revisions\/150"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.potentialismtheory.com\/td\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=123"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.potentialismtheory.com\/td\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=123"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.potentialismtheory.com\/td\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=123"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}